<\/p>\n
As part of the “Future Kyoto Creation Research Project” jointly implemented by the University Consortium Kyoto and Kyoto City, we conduct a detailed analysis of the results of the “Survey on Citizens’ Lives” and compile a report.
Since the results of the “Survey on Citizens’ Experiences in Citizens’ Lives” are a useful source of information that can be used to grasp the awareness and needs of citizens, we believe that they are very effective as basic materials for surveys and research of the “Future Kyoto Creative Research Project,” and we are conducting detailed analysis. This report will be of interest not only to the research and research of the “Future Kyoto Creation Research Project,” but also to Kyoto City officials, students, and those who are engaged in community development activities, so please take a look.<\/p>\n
– What kind of life do citizens have in each policy area, and how important do they think it is?
\u30fb How is the transition of the 5 years of Heisei 23 ~ 27 in the actual life of citizens?
– From the correlation between the level of experience in daily life and the importance of the policy, what is the public’s perception of the current policy and its effects?
\u30fb What kind of policy areas will improve the sense of happiness when the sense of life improves?
– What are the potential needs of citizens that appear in the content of free writing?<\/p>\n
Analysis results related to the 27th “Citizen Life Realization Survey” Overall [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Reference: List of 130 questions in all 27 fields about how to feel about life <\/span>[Click here for details]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n Special Feature: Items that have significantly changed the way citizens feel about their lives over the past five years [Click here for details]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n I. Discussion by Policy Area [Click here for details]<\/span> II. Analysis using statistical analysis methods Overall\u3000<\/span> [Click here for details]<\/span><\/a> 3 Analysis of free text [Click here for details]<\/a><\/p>\n <\/span>III. Outline of the 27th Citizen Life Survey Document 1<\/a><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n The following items are posted as materials.<\/p>\n Bar charts show the level of life and policy importance, and scatter plots show the correlation between the two.<\/p>\n <\/span>\uff11\u3000\u3000 For questions that show a relationship between an increase in a sense of life and an increase in a sense of happiness, you can see the characteristics of each occupation by residence and the number of years of residence<\/span>. It offers a glimpse into the potential needs of citizens with separate residences\u3002 You can see the change in the number of respondents to the citizen life survey in FY23~27. \u3000Feeling of life<\/a>, Policy importance<\/a>, level of interest in city government<\/a>, and response<\/a> results by residence of happiness<\/span>I understand.<\/p>\n – What is the citizen’s sense of life, the importance of policies, the level of interest in city government, and the sense of happiness? Analysis results related to the 26th “Citizen Life Realization Survey” Overall [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n I. Outline of the 26th Citizen Life Survey Overall [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span> II. Results of responses to the questionnaire on the perception of daily life, importance of policies, interest in municipal government, and happiness [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span> III. Analysis using statistical analysis methods [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span> The following items are posted as materials.<\/p>\n You can see the change in the number of respondents by residence to the Citizen Life Realization Survey in FY23~26. \u3000Feeling of life<\/a>, Policy importance<\/a>, level of interest in city government<\/a>, and response<\/a> results by residence of happiness<\/span>I understand.<\/p>\n You can see the special color of each attribute. Click here for interest in city politics<\/a> and click here for happiness feelings<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u3000In addition to providing insights into all 27 policy areas<\/a>, the report uses bar charts to show the actual perception of people’s lives and the importance of policies, and scatter plots to show the correlation between the two.<\/p>\n <\/span>1 Environment\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000 For questions that showed significant changes, we can see the characteristics of the residence classification. [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n You can see how citizens’ feelings have moved in which policy areas, and the status of different residences. For questions that show a relationship between an increase in a sense of life and an increase in a sense of happiness, you can see the characteristics of each occupation by residence and the number of years of residence<\/span>. [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n It gives us a glimpse into the potential needs of citizens with a segregation of residences. [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span> <\/p>\n \u30fbComparison results with the average of the past two years in terms of actual living conditions<\/span> Analysis results related to the 25th “Citizen Life Realization Survey” Overall [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n I. Outline of the 25th Citizen Life Survey [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span> The following items are posted as materials.<\/span> 1 Environment\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000 \u30fb Analysis edition Table of contents [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
<\/span><\/a>For all 27 policy areas, the report describes what can be seen from the results of responses on the actual feeling of life and the importance of policy.<\/p>\n
1 Changes in the relationship between policy importance and life perception in FY25~27 [Click here for details]<\/span><\/a>
<\/span><\/span>
2 Correlation between generations and gender in the perception of life and happiness<\/span> [Click here for details]<\/a>\u3000
(1) Characteristic questions in this year’s response results
(2) Questions that were correlated across a wide range of attributes
(3) Analysis of correlations by policy area
It describes about.<\/p>\n
<\/span><\/span>IV. Results of responses to the questionnaire on the perception of daily life, the importance of policies, the level of interest in municipal government, and the feeling of happiness Overall [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fbStatus of responses by generation and gender of life experience Appendix 2<\/a>
\u30fbStatus of responses by generation and gender on the importance of policy Appendix 3<\/a>
\u30fbRanking of positive response rates in terms of living experience and policy importance (city-wide) Document 4<\/a>
<\/span>\u30fbRespondents by generation and gender in the level of interest in city politics Appendix 5<\/a>
\u30fbStatus of responses by generation and gender of happiness Appendix 6<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\nLiterature <\/h3>\n
(1) <\/span><\/span>Citizens’ perceptions of daily life, policy importance, and correlation between them in each<\/span> of the 27 policy areas<\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
\nEnvironment<\/a> 2\u3000\u3000
\nHuman Rights and Gender Equality<\/a> 3\u3000\u3000
\nYouth Growth and Participation<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000
\uff14\u3000\u3000
\nCivic Life & Community<\/a> 5\u3000\u3000
\nCivil Life Safety<\/a> 6\u3000\u3000
\nculture<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\uff17\u3000\u3000
\nSport<\/a> 8\u3000\u3000
\nIndustrial & Commercial<\/a> 9\u3000\u3000
\ntourism<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\uff11\uff10\u3000
\nAgriculture and Forestry<\/a> 11\u3000
\nUniversity<\/a> 12\u3000
\ninternationalization<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\uff11\uff13\u3000
\nParenting Support<\/a> 14\u3000
\nWelfare for Persons with Disabilities<\/a> 15\u3000
\nCommunity Welfare<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\uff11\uff16\u3000
\nWelfare for the elderly<\/a> 17\u3000
\nHealth and Hygiene 18<\/a>\u3000
\nSchooling<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\uff11\uff19\u3000
\nLifelong Learning<\/a> 20\u3000
\nWalking Town<\/a> 21\u3000
\nLand Use and Urban Functional Arrangement<\/a>\u3000
\uff12\uff12\u3000
\nLandscape<\/a> 23\u3000
\nBuildings<\/a> 24\u3000
\nhousing<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\uff12\uff15\u3000
\nRoads and greenery<\/a> 26<\/p>\n(2) Correlation between living conditions and happiness by residence, occupation and years of residence<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
\u3000By Residence, by<\/a> occupation and number of years of residence<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n(3) Results of analysis by residence, occupation, and number of years of residence in free-form writing<\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
\u3000By Residence, by<\/a> occupation and number of years of residence<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000<\/span> <\/p>\n(4) Status of responses to the Survey on Citizen Life by Residence, Occupation, and Years of Residence (Supplementary Material 1 of the Summary Booklet)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
\u3000By Residence, by<\/a> occupation and number of years of residence<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000<\/p>\n(5) Status of responses by residence to the Survey of Citizens’ Perception of Life (Summary Booklet Material 2~6 Supplementary Materials)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
FY2014 “Survey on Citizens’ Lives” Report<\/h3>\n
\u30fb Compared to the average of the past three years in Heisei 23 ~ 25 in the actual life of citizens, how is Heisei 26
– From the correlation between the level of experience in daily life and the importance of the policy, what is the public’s perception of the current policy and its effects?
\u30fb What kind of policy areas will improve the sense of happiness when the sense of life improves?
– What are the potential needs of citizens that appear in the content of free writing?<\/p>\nData in the analysis results (summary booklet)<\/h3>\n
Reference: List of 130 questions in all 27 fields about how to feel about life [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fbResponses by generation and gender in the Survey on Citizens’ Perceptions of Life Appendix 1<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n
\u30fbStatus of responses by generation and gender of life experience Appendix 2<\/a>
\u30fbStatus of responses by generation and gender on the importance of policy Appendix 3<\/a>
\u30fbRanking of the percentage of positive responses in terms of life perception and policy importance (city-wide) Appendix 4<\/a>
<\/span>\u30fbRespondents by generation and gender in the level of interest in city politics Appendix 5<\/a>
\u30fbStatus of responses by generation and gender of happiness Appendix 6<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
1 List of generations and genders showing remarkable changes in life perception compared to the average of the past three years7<\/span>\u3000<\/a><\/span>
2 Two-year change in correlation between life perception and policy importance by generation and gender correlation Figure<\/span> 8<\/a>\u3000<\/span>
\u3000\u3000\u3000CityWide<\/a> YouthMaleYouthFemaleMiddle-Aged<\/a><\/a> <\/a>MaleMiddle-Aged Woman<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\u3000\u3000\u3000Older Male Older Woman<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000<\/a>
<\/span>\uff13Correlation between Generational and Gender Correlations in Perception of Life and Happiness<\/span>\u3000Appendix 9<\/a><\/span>
4 Results of analysis of generation and gender in<\/span> free writing [Click here for details]<\/a>\u3000
<\/span><\/p>\nLiterature <\/h3>\n
(1) Status of responses by residence to the Survey on Citizens’ Perception of Life (Summary Booklet Material 1 Supplementary Materials)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
\u3000[Click here for details]<\/a><\/p>\n(2) Status of Responses by Residence to the Survey on Citizen Life Perceptions (Summary Booklet Material 2~6 Supplementary Materials)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
(3) Results of responses by level of interest in municipal government, happiness by occupation, and number of years of residence (Summary booklet materials 5 and 6 supplementary materials)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
(4) Citizens‘ perceptions of life in each of the 27 policy areas, the importance of policies, and their correlations by generation, gender, and residence (Supplementary materials 2, 3, 4, and 8 of the summary booklet)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
2. Human Rights and Gender Equality\u3000 \u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
3 Youth growth and participation\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
4 Civic life and community\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
5 Safety of Citizens’ Lives\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
6 CultureCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
7 Sports\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
8 Industry & Commerce\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000 \u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
9 Sightseeing\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
10 Agriculture and forestry\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
11 Colleges and universitiesCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
12 Internationalization\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
13 Child-rearing support\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
14 Welfare for Persons with Disabilities\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nFeeling of life<\/a>\u3000\u3000Correlation between Policy Importance:<\/a> Perception of Life and Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n
15 Community Welfare\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
16 Welfare for the Elderly\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
17 Health and Hygiene\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
18 Schooling\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
19. Lifelong Learning\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nFeeling of life<\/a>\u3000\u3000Correlation between Policy Importance:<\/a> Perception of Life and Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n
20 Walking towns\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
21 Land Use and Urban Functional Arrangement\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
22 Landscape\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
23 Buildings\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
24 Housing\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nFeeling of life<\/a>\u3000\u3000Correlation between Policy Importance:<\/a> Perception of Life and Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n
25 Roads and greenery\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
26 Fire and Disaster Prevention\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000 \u3000
\nCorrelation<\/a> between Actual Life and<\/a> Policy Importance<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
27 Water for Life\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\n<\/a>Importance of Lifestyle Realization Policy<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000Correlation between Lifestyle Perception and Policy Importance<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n(5) List of Residential Categories that showed significant changes in the actual living conditions compared to the average of the past three years (Summary Booklet Appendix 7)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
(6) Two-year change in correlation between living conditions and policy importance by residence (Summary Booklet Appendix 8)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
\u3000 Kita-kuKamigyo-kuSakyo-kuNakagyo-kuHigashiyama-kuYamashina-ku <\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\u3000<\/a>Shimogyo-ku,<\/a> Minami-ku,<\/a> Ukyo-ku,<\/a> Nishikyo-ku,<\/a> Fushimi-ku<\/a>\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n(7) Correlation between Perception of Life and Happiness by Residence, Occupation, and Years of Residence (Supplementary Material 9 of the Summary Booklet)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
(8) Results of Analysis of Residence Differentiation in Free Writing<\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n
FY2013 Citizen Life Survey Report<\/h3>\n
What can we learn from the analysis?<\/h4>\n
– Policy priority based on the correlation between people’s lives and policy importance<\/span>
\u30fbPolicy areas where there is a correlation between the perception of life and the feeling of happiness<\/span>
– Potential needs of different generations through free-form analysis<\/span>
– Trends and issues of generation and gender in terms of life and policy importance by policy area<\/span><\/p>\nData in the results of the analysis<\/h5>\n
Reference: 130 items in 27 fields [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
II. Results of responses to the questionnaire on the perception of daily life, importance of policies, interest in municipal government, and happiness [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
III. Analysis using statistical analysis methods<\/span>
1 Comparison with the average of the past two years in terms of actual life [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
2. Consideration of policy priorities based on policy importance and lifestyle experience [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
3 Correlation between the perception of life and the feeling of happiness [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
4 Analysis of free text [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
IV. Discussion by Policy Area [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span><\/p>\nLiterature <\/h4>\n
\u30fbAggregation of the results of a survey of 130 items in all 27 policy areas by generation, gender, and residence<\/span>
– Aggregation of policy importance in all 27 policy areas by generation, gender, and residence
<\/span>– Policy priorities by generation, gender, and residence in terms of the relationship between life perception and policy importance in all 27 policy areas<\/span><\/p>\nData in the Archives<\/h5>\n
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
2. Human Rights and Gender Equality\u3000 \u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
3 Youth growth and participation\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
4 Civic life and community\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
5 Safety of Citizens’ Lives\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
6 CultureActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
7 Sports\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
8 Industry & Commerce\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000 \u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
9 Sightseeing\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
10 Agriculture and forestry\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
11 Colleges and universitiesActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
12 Internationalization\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
13 Child-rearing support\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
14 Welfare for Persons with Disabilities\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
15 Community Welfare\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
16 Welfare for the ElderlyActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
17 Health and Hygiene\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
18 Schooling\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
19. Lifelong Learning\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
20 Walking towns\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
21 Land Use and Urban Functional ArrangementActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
22 Landscape\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
23 Buildings\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
24 Housing\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
25 Roads and greenery\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\nActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
26 Fire and Disaster PreventionActual Life ExperiencePolicy<\/a> ImportancePolicy<\/a> Priorities<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000
\n
27 Water for Life\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000
\n<\/a>Importance of Lifestyle Realization Policy<\/a>\u3000\u3000
\n\u3000\u3000Policy Priorities<\/a><\/a><\/p>\nFY2012 Citizen Life Survey Report<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\u30fb Analysis Introduction [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fbAnalysis 1 (1) Overview of the Citizen Life Survey [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fbAnalysis 1 (2) Summary of the simple aggregation results of each survey item (feeling of life, importance of policies, level of interest in city government, sense of happiness) [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fb Analysis 2 (1) Attributes that showed characteristic trends compared to the city as a whole in the response of Heisei 24 [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fb Analysis 2 (2) Attributes that showed significant changes in the responses of FY23 and FY24 [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fbAnalysis 3 (1) Relationship between the importance of policies and the perception of daily life [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fbAnalysis 3 (2) Relationship between whether or not to choose the importance of a policy and how people feel about their lives [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fbAnalysis 3 (3) Visualization of the importance of policies by generation and gender [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fb Analysis 3 (4) Correlation between happiness and life [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fb Analysis 4 Analysis of free writing [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fb Analysis edition Conclusion [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>
\u30fb Material edition 1 Graph of life realization “1 Environment” [Click here for details]<\/a><\/span>