HOME » We announced analysis result of “civic life actual feeling investigation” in 2013!

We announced analysis result of “civic life actual feeling investigation” in 2013!

We will publish the results of the analysis of the 2013 “Survey of Citizens’ Life Experiences” conducted as part of the “Future Kyoto Creation Research Project” jointly implemented by the University Consortium Kyoto and Kyoto City.

As part of Kyoto City’s policy evaluation system, the “Survey of Citizens’ Lifestyles” is conducted to ascertain how citizens feel about the extent to which the policies and measures listed in the city’s basic plan have been achieved. , and the analysis results can be used by Kyoto City staff, students, and those involved in urban development activities as a useful source of information to understand the awareness and needs of citizens.

In addition, as materials, the results of a survey on life perceptions of 130 items in 27 policy fields by generation, gender, and residence, the results of a survey on the importance of policies in all 27 policy fields, and the correlation between perceptions of life and the importance of policies. is also posted.
Please take a look.

1409306369_line-chart-128

What the analysis reveals

・Results of comparison with the average of the past two years in life perception
・Priority of policies seen from the correlation between life perception and policy importance・Policy areas with
correlation between life perception and happiness perception
needs
and policy areas, and trends and issues by generation and gender from the perspective of policy importance

Analysis result data

Overall Analysis Results of the 2013 Citizens’ Life Experience Survey [Click here for details]

I Overview of the 2013 Citizens’ Life Experience Survey [Click here for details]
 (Reference) A survey of 130 items in all 27 fields About the items [Click here for details]
II About the results of responses to life perception, policy importance, interest in municipal administration, and feeling of well-being [Click here
for details] III About analysis using statistical analysis methods
 1 Average for the past two years in life perception [Click here for  details]
 2. Examination of policy priority based on the degree of policy importance and life experience [Click here for details]
 3. Correlation between perceived life and perceived happiness [Click here for details]
 4. Analysis of free description [Click here for details]
IV. Considerations by policy area 
[Click here for details]

Materials 

The following items are posted as materials.
・Survey results of 130 items in 27 policy areas, aggregated by generation, gender, and residence ・Aggregate
of policy importance in all 27 policy areas, by generation, gender, and residence
・Life experience and policies in all 27 policy areas Policy priorities by generation, gender, and residence from the relationship of
importance Therefore, it is considered necessary to raise the overall level of policy areas where life experience and policy importance are low.)

Data in References

1 Environmental
Life Experience   Policy Importance   Policy Priority
2 Human Rights/Gender Equality
Life Experience   Policy Importance   Policy Priority
3 Youth Growth and Participatory
Life Experience   Policy Importance   Policy Priority
4 Citizen Life and Community
life experience   policy importance   Policy priority
5 Safety
life experience   policy importance   Policy priority
6 Cultural
life experience   policy importance   Policy priority
7 Sports
life experience   policy importance   Policy priority
8 Industrial/commercial
life experience   policy importance   Policy priority
9 Tourism
life experience   Policy importance   Policy priority
10 Agriculture and forestry
life experience   Policy importance   Policy priority
11 University
life experience   Policy importance   Policy priority
12 Internationalization
life experience   policy Importance   Policy priority
13 Parenting support
life experience   policy Importance   Policy priority
14 Welfare for persons with disabilities
life experience   policy Importance   Policy priority
15 Degree
life experience  policy Importance  Policy priority
16 Elderly welfare

life experience   policy Importance  Policy priority
17 health and medical
life experience   policy Importance  Policy priority
18 school education
life experience   policy Importance  Policy priority
19 lifelong learning
life experience   policy Importance  Policy priority
20 walking
life experience   policy Importance  Policy priority
21 Land use and urban function layout
life experience   policy Importance  Policy priority
22 Landscape
life experience   policy importance   policy priority
23 Building
life experience   policy importance   policy priority
24 Residential
life experience   policy importance policy   priority
25 Road and green
life experience   policy importance   policy priority
26 Firefighting/disaster prevention
life experience   policy Importance   Policy Priority
27 Water
Life Experience   Policy Importance   Policy Priority

Contact information

Public Interest Incorporated Foundation Consortium of Universities Kyoto Think Tank Project
TEL +81-75-708-5803 FAX +81-75-353-9101
Campus Plaza Kyoto, Shimogyo-ku, Kyoto 600-8216
*Reception hours: Tuesday-Saturday 9:00-17:00 00 (excluding year-end and New Year holidays)
PAGE TOP